a judge’s conduct/behaviour - canadian government conspiracies

Canadian Bill of Rights
Go to content

Main menu:

a judge’s conduct/behaviour

Home > Canadian social safety net
Canadian Judicial Council
Last revised on Sunday, July 16, 2017 Last reviewed 2017-09-07

see "Important"  in the Recent Reveision section above

As agreed, there are 4 national tribunals mentioned in the British North America Act? Section 96 has the Superior, District, and County Courts which are to be found in each Province and section 101 has General Court of Appeal for Canada.
a)    Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Article 8. Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. All juristic governments are elected by enumerated classes of subject which have no authority to merge or stream line the above mentioned courts to include private individuals under their jurisdiction without violating Charter s31 which triggers Charter s52 2017-07-13
As agreed, any self-represented woman or man according to the Canadian Judicial Council should have the following expectations when seeking court remedies:
a)    Ottawa, 12 December 2006 – The Canadian Judicial Council issued a statement of principles today on self-represented persons, to foster equal access to justice and equal treatment under the law.
i)      These principles will assist key participants in the justice system to ensure that self-represented persons are provided with fair access and equal treatment in the bijural courts and receive a fair trial.
ii)     Judges and other participants in the justice system have a responsibility to promote opportunities for everyone to understand and meaningfully present their case, whether or not they have legal representation." To make sure that people are standing in an inherent jurisdiction courts seeking the administration of justice not a statutory court!
iii)    "After a detailed examination of the issue, the Committee concluded that self-represented persons are generally uninformed about their rights and about the consequences of the options they choose like agreeing to enter statutory courts," said Chief Justice Monnin.
iv)   Woman or man will find court procedures deliberately complex, confusing and intimidating in violation of charter s26, s27 and s31 and they are not given or provided with the knowledge or skills to participate actively and effectively in their own litigation."
v)    This unanimous high bench endorsed the Canadian Judicial Council’s 2006 statement of principles on self-represented litigants that judges “should do whatever is possible to provide a fair and impartial process and prevent an unfair disadvantage to self-represented persons.”
vi)  As agreed, many of the CJC Statement of Principles (Highlights) are in reality actually inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms?
vii)   The Canadian Judicial Council is a federal body created under the Judges Act with the mandate to promote efficiency, uniformity, and accountability, and to improve the quality of judicial service in the superior courts of Canada constitution Act s96, that deals with the non-enumerated classes of subjects. These are not the courts under legislate codes, rules, regulations, statutes, policies, or procedures. 2017-07-13
Copyright 2015-2017 - all Human Rights Reserved
Back to content | Back to main menu