Any Reasonable Personlast revised October 4, 2019
Adhesion contract/Affidavit of truthCourt documents must only meet the standard "AS ANY REASONABLE PERSON WOULD UNDERSTAND" and that is all! A "REASONABLE PERSON" does not speak or understand legal jargon or the prescribe way to fill out forms
Ignorance of the law regarding this fact is no excuse. And your ignorance of our human rights [public fool system] not their statutory crap is what the government are counting on!
In violation of our human rights, the government has made it so that free people that have figured out there is a Superior Court in British Columbia will find a statutory court not the constitutional court.
Free people will find they have to surrender their human rights for the privileges offered to B.C. residents!
Not something a reasonable person would expect!
Unfortunately for the juristic unit not everyone is enumerated as a class of subject under the democratic governments’ authority like the are brain washing us to believe!
A reasonable person would expect to find steps to follow to access the common law court. Everything, in violation of Charter s31 is fraudulently under administrative law-controlled courts.
Stepping into any statutory court automatically removes your inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms. You have admitted to not knowing that a statutory court has no jurisdiction over common folk just things they created and have complete control over. Not something a reasonable person would expect to find.
"Constitutionally, your documents must meet the standard "AS ANY REASONABLE PERSON WOULD UNDERSTAND" only.
written by hand if necessary
"And be it further enacted. That no summons, writ, declaration, return, process, judgment, or other proceedings in civil cases in any of the courts or the United States, shall be abated, arrested, quashed or reversed, for any defect or want of form, but the said courts respectively shall proceed and give judgment according as the right of the cause and matter in law shall appear unto them, without regarding any imperfections, defects or want of form in such writ, declaration, or other pleading, returns process, judgment, or course of proceeding whatsoever, except those only in cases of demurrer, which the party demurring shall specially sit down and express together with his demurrer as the cause thereof. And the said courts respectively shall and may, by virtue of this act, from time to time, amend all and every such imperfections, defects and wants of form, other than those only which the party demurring shall express as aforesaid, and may at any, time, permit either of the parties to amend any defect in the process of pleadings upon such conditions as the said courts respectively shall in their discretion, and by their rules prescribe (a) "Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789, Section 342,FIRST CONGRESS, Sess. 1, ch. 20, 1789