Regarding these trespasses on rights:
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org;
email@example.com; Jody.WilsonRaybould@parl.gc.ca; AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca;
firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
firstname.lastname@example.org; Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca; email@example.com
1.As agreed, your adhesion contract offer to dismiss this
matter was refused, Reason it violates the law of the land, the rule of law and
unalienable human rights!
The Supreme Court of Canada’s endorsement of the Statement of
Principles provides clear direction to lower courts that, in some
cases, a strict application of court procedural rules against a
self-represented litigant may lead to an injustice.
2.As agreed, I do own property! I as
a man have the right and freedom to seek, receive and impart information and
ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in
print, in the form of art, or through any other media or email account of my
choice including firstname.lastname@example.org.
3.As agreed, the Competition Bureau
failed when given a chance to explain how some pencil-pushing bureaucrat at the
Competition Bureau, has the authority under the rule of law to grant Canada
Post redemption and protection for violating the charter, contract law and the
rule of law and not its competition. Courts may not treat a self-represented
litigant in the same way in which they treat a lawyer.
4.As agreed, the government and its
agencies have a different set of rules they get to play by compared than the
rest of us “in such a competitive and innovative marketplace”.
5.At agreed there is no a high
court ruling that allows some bureaucrat, Canada Post or the Competition Bureau
to operate outside the rule of law regarding this matter so you will get on
with your mandate and protect my property. Void ab initio: Void from the
beginning - from the first fact. Void on its face, a nullity, without force and
6.At agreed the Competition Bureaus’
claim to have the authority to allow Canada Post to violate the rule of law and
private property in the performance of its mandate does not exist. Actus
legis nemini facit injuriam: An act of law does injury to no man.
7.As agreed it is time for this
government to stand up and fulfil - “We have also committed to set a higher bar
for openness and transparency in government. It is time to shine more light on
government to ensure it remains focused on the people it serves. Government and
its information should be open by default. If we want Canadians to trust their
government, we need a government that trusts Canadians. It is important that we
acknowledge mistakes when we make them. Canadians do not expect us to be
perfect – they expect us to be honest, open, and sincere in our efforts to
serve the public interest.”
8.As agreed, “Since 1931, Canadian citizens are not
subject to laws enacted by the British Government or its representatives and
are not recognized by Great Britain as British subjects.” I care not that
your civil law government created its own queen. Your fictional queen like you
are not my government – you are my public servants!
9.As agreed, the Right to access to
records belong to the public who shall on request, be given access to any
record under the control of a government institution.
10.As agreed, any person who makes a
request has a right of access to any record in the custody or under the control
of a public body, not just records containing personal information about the
11.As agreed, the head of any public
body/enumerated class of subject as in the Competition Bureau and those higher
up the food chain must make every reasonable effort to assist applicants/members
of the public and to respond immediately to each applicant openly, accurately
12.As agreed, the head of a public
body must respond not later than 30 days after receiving a request like this
or be in breach of duty!
13.As agreed, the statement “We have
reviewed your information and determined that the matter you have raised falls
more directly within the mandate of another organization”. That statement is
not transparent. Which organization is that when we are talking about Canada
Post having an illegal advantage over the competition?
14.As agreed, the Competition Bureau
has no authority to make a statement like this - “As we will not be pursuing
this matter further!” It is a breach of trust and duty and a trespass on human
15.As agreed, there was no constructive
dialogue with this Canadian.
16.As agreed, your position made no
attempt to “identifying ways to find solutions and avoid escalating conflicts
17.As agreed, there was no due
process of law. Your government prescribed regulations makes it very clear as
to how independent a law enforcement agency you really are.
18.As agreed, the recognition and
protection of the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and property being
the only proper purposes of government. - It is hereby recognized and
declared that in Canada there have existed and shall continue to exist without
discrimination by reason of race, national origin, colour, religion or sex, the
following human rights and fundamental freedoms, namely,
right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person andenjoyment of property, and
the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law;
right of the individual to equality before the law and the protection of the
Post was granted a pass by the Competition Bureau to continue violating its contracts
and trespass on property and the Competition Bureau has shown no due process of
19.As agreed, everyone whose rights
or freedoms are allegedly violated has the right, either in person or through
legally authorized representation, to complain to the Competition Bureau. That
complaint shall be promptly reviewed in a public hearing before an independent,
impartial and competent judicial or other authority established by law and to
obtain from such an authority a decision, in accordance with the rule of law. A
ruling for providing redress, including any compensation due, where there has
been a violation of that person's rights or freedoms, as well as enforcement of
the eventual decision and award, all without undue delay. I was not informed of
any public hearing before an independent, impartial and competent judiciary
regarding this matter.
If Canada Post did not make such false and misleading representations to the public Canada Post would quickly go out of business!
Competition Bureau Complaint!
As a man, I wish to make a claim that CANADA POST makes false and misleading representations to the public. In addition, "Abuse of dominant position".
Canada Post acts as if they will deliver all packages, envelops to the contracted address as written on the packages, and envelops and agreed to every time and in many cases on time just as the competition does. The truth of the matter is that only the competition will fulfill the contract as written every time and on time.
The reality is a package delivered on time to the contracted addressee by Canada Post does not included delivery to any of Canada Post’s cost cutting measures, it means to the address and addressee at its final destination or a contract breach is in place.
When Canada Post fails to deliver all packages, envelops to the contracted addresses on the packages, and envelops exactly as agreed to they are in breach of contract on those they do not fulfil as written. This has a ripple down effect causing many businesses depending on Canada Post to fulfill their contracts as written to breach their contracts with their customers as well.
Right under the federal governments noses Canada Post’s present internal operating procedures and cost-cutting measures has given Canada a two-tier postal service. Some customers have an address that Canada Post will honour the contract on and others that it will not! Only trouble is, is the false and misleading representations to the public, not to mention Canada Post has failed in its mandate to maintain the equality of service the postal service once offered.
Canada Post believes their internal policies allows Canada Post to operate outside and above Canadian law, whenever and wherever they choose and that has to stop or be fully disclosed to the public so other arrangement can be made to use the competition.
When the false and misleading representations to the public by Canada Post ends, everyone will know to use the competition if they wanted all of their packages, envelops etcetera delivered to the contracted addresses every time on time