Bank Assocoations imprescriptible human rights violation - canadian government conspiracies

Go to content

Bank Assocoations imprescriptible human rights violation

Government > Actions Taken
Canadian Banking Conspiracy
 
According to the British North America Act 1867 section 91 the federal government has jurisdiction over the Canadian banking system. Canada is required under that section to deliver in section 16. Savings Banks.
 
This is required to be done without violating the inalienable rights of any Canadians.
 
The Bank Act received Royal assent indicating that it is constitutionally correct and complies with international treaty requirements.

At one point in time the “personal deposit account” found in section 439 of the Bank Act was the account individuals were offered when an individual went into open a bank account. Basically all that was required, was a signature on a signature card and not much else.

That was before the arrival of the banking regulations which were never given Royal assent and are not bijurally correct or constitutionally correct.

Nor do they comply with international treaty requirements that everyone living in Canada and not just the citizens of bijural Canada are equally entitled to open a bank account.

All of the people living in Canada have imprescriptible inalienable rights that cannot be prescribed by regulations. According to the Banks all people must submit to being regulated in violation of their rights or they will not be allowed to open a bank “savings account” that according to the Constitution has to be available. Which is another violation of their rights and also violates the Bank Act regulations.

“Retail deposit accounts” on the other hand are regulated and therefore violate the imprescriptible rights of all the people living in Canada.

No human being has to do anything one of these licensed banks orders/requires us to do unless we work for one of them. Those so not employed are not in servitude to the internal operating procedures of any bank!

Which brings us to today, when the same class of individual mentioned above goes into a bank to open a bank account, the Bank automatically profiles everyone as operating in “commerce” and that requires a “retail deposit account” and disqualifies and discriminates equally against all individuals from opening a “personal deposit account” savings account. They do this because the “retail deposit accounts” have become such a cash grab for the banks. Even though that individual has imprescriptible rights, there is little chance that the individual will know about his or her rights, and even less that they will have any idea of how to defend themselves against such rights violations.

There is also an apparent conspiracy to commit fraud among the members of the banking system to refuse to offer anyone the “personal deposit account” defined in the Bank Act section 439. No one with that type of account can be prescribed and nickel and dimed to death by regulations because of the imprescriptible inalienable rights everyone has. This illegal position is in violation of the Bank Act and the rights of the people of Canada.

Want proof, check out your favourite bank and see for yourself!

The Bank Act received Royal assent and the preamble says that everyone operating under the Bank Act must be in compliance with “taking into account the rights and interests of depositors and other consumers of banking services”. To me that would mean all banks are in violation of the Bank Act!
 
Click on the links to the left to discover what issues the webmaster has had with the banks involved:
 

Toronto Dominion Bank Rights Violation Court Order

The Toronto Dominion Bank has been profiling all new customers to be operating in commerce and requiring a retail bank account in a bijural country. Violating the imprescriptible human rights of Canadians. By denying you access to a personal deposit account they get to charge you fees which would not be possible with the personal deposit account which no bank will allow you to access even though you have a right to.

The banks have come up with a way to make huge profits on human mistakes, something the government hasn’t figured out how to do yet! How is it that when a human being makes a mistake and ends up with the nonsufficient funds charge the Bank automatically profits by nearly $50 per occurrence? The only reason this is happening is because the Toronto Dominion Bank does not offer the type of account that cannot be prescribed with such ridiculous charges, another human rights violation.

The Toronto Dominion Bank like all banks has been freezing the private property of human beings, when a human being made a cash deposit through the ATM. The Bank is then pooling those frozen assets and using it for short-term investments blaming it all on the programming behind the ATM's.

How is it that the Toronto Dominion Bank like all other banks can allow the Canada Revenue Agency or anyone else including themselves to access your private property held in trust without seeing a court order? They can’t legally!

How is it that a fictional Bank like the TD Bank has any authority over a human being? Obviously they don't unless you consent to do what you're told by them. The only people the TD Bank can tell what to do are being paid by Toronto Dominion Bank! It is the human being that gets to dictate how he or she will communicate with the Bank, for example.

Response to Legal Notice - NONE!

Court order registered in the Superior Court of British Columbia

On Monday, February 22, 2016 an “exchange of consents” court order was registered in a Nanaimo County Courthouse regarding the Toronto Dominion Bank and the affiant. The court order was not rejected by the registrar and is therefore in good standing.

The court order was supported by an affidavit that was not rebutted in the time frame given.

The Toronto Dominion Bank and the named legal Officer of the TD Bank have 30 days from today Tuesday, March 1, 2016 to satisfy the court order requirements.

The Toronto Dominion Bank considers itself to be above the LAW
ScotiaBank Rights Violation Court Order

The ScotiaBank has been profiling all new customers to be operating in commerce and requiring a retail bank account in a bijural country. Violating the imprescriptible human rights of Canadians. By denying you access to a personal deposit account they get to charge you fees which would not be possible with the personal deposit account which no bank will allow you to access even though you have a right to.

The banks have come up with a way to make huge profits on human mistakes, something the government hasn’t figured out how to do yet! How is it that when a human being makes a mistake and ends up with the nonsufficient funds charge the Bank automatically profits by nearly $50 per occurrence? The only reason this is happening is because the ScotiaBank does not offer the type of account that cannot be prescribed with such ridiculous charges, another human rights violation.

The ScotiaBank like all banks has been freezing the private property of human beings, when a human being made a cash deposit through the ATM. The Bank is then pooling those frozen assets and using it for short-term investments blaming it all on the programming behind the ATM's.

How is it that the ScotiaBank like all other banks can allow the Canada Revenue Agency or anyone else including themselves to access your private property held in trust without seeing a court order? They can’t legally!

How is it that a fictional Bank like the ScotiaBank has any authority over a human being? Obviously they don't unless you consent to do what you're told by them. The only people ScotiaBank can tell what to do are being paid by ScotiaBank! It is the human being that gets to dictate how he or she will communicate with the Bank, for example.

Legal Notice

Court order registered in the common law Superior Court of British Columbia
RES JUDICATA’
On Monday, March 14, 2016 an “exchange of consents” court order was registered in the Nanaimo County Courthouse regarding theScotiaBank and the affiant. The court order was not rejected by the registrar and is therefore in good standing.
The court order was supported by an affidavit that was not rebutted in the time frame given.
ScotiaBank has 30 days from today Friday, March 18, 2016 to satisfy the court order requirements.

THIS COURT ORDERS that: redacted

RBC Rights Violation Court Order

The Royal Bank has been profiling all new customers to be operating in commerce and requiring a retail bank account in a bijural country. Violating the imprescriptible human rights of Canadians. By denying you access to a personal deposit account they get to charge you fees which would not be possible with the personal deposit account which no bank will allow you to access even though you have a right to.

The banks have come up with a way to make huge profits on human mistakes, something the government hasn’t figured out how to do yet! How is it that when a human being makes a mistake and ends up with the nonsufficient funds charge the Bank automatically profits by nearly $50 per occurrence? The only reason this is happening is because the RBC does not offer the type of account that cannot be prescribed with such ridiculous charges, another human rights violation.

The Royal Bank like all banks has been freezing the private property of human beings, when a human being made a cash deposit through the ATM. The Bank is then pooling those frozen assets and using it for short-term investments blaming it all on the programming behind the ATM's.

How is it that the Royal Bank like all other banks can allow the Canada Revenue Agency or anyone else including themselves to access your private property held in trust without seeing a court order? They can’t legally!

How is it that a fictional Bank like the Royal Bank has any authority over a human being? Obviously they don't unless you consent to do what you're told by them. The only people the Royal Bank can tell what to do are being paid by RBC! It is the human being that gets to dictate how he or she will communicate with the Bank, for example.

Legal Notice
Court order registered in the common law Superior Court of British Columbia
RES JUDICATA’
On Monday, March 14, 2016 an “exchange of consents” court order was registered in the Nanaimo County Courthouse regarding theRoyal Bank and the affiant. The court order was not rejected by the registrar and is therefore in good standing.
The court order was supported by an affidavit that was not rebutted in the time frame given.
The Royal Bank has 30 days from today Friday, March 18, 2016 to satisfy the court order requirements.
THIS COURT ORDERS that: redacted

Under the affiant’s inalienable right to “freedom of expression” this matter has been posted online
CIBC Rights Violation Court Order

The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has been profiling all new customers to be operating in commerce and requiring a retail bank account in a bijural country. Violating the imprescriptible human rights of Canadians. By denying you access to a personal deposit account they get to charge you fees which would not be possible with the personal deposit account which no bank will allow you to access even though you have a right to.

The banks have come up with a way to make huge profits on human mistakes, something the government hasn’t figured out how to do yet! How is it that when a human being makes a mistake and ends up with the nonsufficient funds charge the Bank automatically profits by nearly $50 per occurrence? The only reason this is happening is because the CIBC does not offer the type of account that cannot be prescribed with such ridiculous charges, another human rights violation.

The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce like all banks has been freezing the private property of human beings, when a human being made a cash deposit through the ATM. The Bank is then pooling those frozen assets and using it for short-term investments blaming it all on the programming behind the ATM's.

How is it that the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce like all other banks can allow the Canada Revenue Agency or anyone else including themselves to access your private property held in trust without seeing a court order? They can’t legally!

How is it that a fictional Bank like the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has any authority over a human being? Obviously they don't unless you consent to do what you're told by them. The only people the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce can tell what to do are being paid by CIBC! It is the human being that gets to dictate how he or she will communicate with the Bank, for example.

Legal Notice
Court order registered in the common law Superior Court of British Columbia
RES JUDICATA’
On Monday, March 14, 2016 an “exchange of consents” court order was registered in the Nanaimo County Courthouse regarding the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and the affiant. The court order was not rejected by the registrar and is therefore in good standing.
The court order was supported by an affidavit that was not rebutted in the time frame given.
The Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce has 30 days from today Friday, March 18, 2016 to satisfy the court order requirements.

THIS COURT ORDERS that: redacted

BMO Rights Violation Court Order

The Bank of Montréal has been profiling all new customers to be operating in commerce and requiring a retail bank account in a bijural country. Violating the imprescriptible human rights of Canadians. By denying you access to a personal deposit account they get to charge you fees which would not be possible with the personal deposit account which no bank will allow you to access even though you have a right to.

The banks have come come up with a way to make huge profits on human mistakes, something the government hasn’t figured out how to do yet! How is it that when a human being makes a mistake and ends up with the nonsufficient funds charge the Bank automatically profits by nearly $50 per occurrence? The only reason this is happening is because the Bank of Montréal does not offer the type of account that cannot be prescribed with such ridiculous charges, another human rights violation.

The Bank of Montréal like all banks has been freezing the private property of human beings, when a human being made a cash deposit through the ATM and was called on it. Less than a year later the Bank of Montréal announces the installation of new ATM machines, ones that will not freeze cash deposits.

How is it that the Bank of Montréal like all other banks can allow the Canada Revenue Agency or anyone else including themselves to access your private property held in trust without seeing a court order? They can’t legally!

How is it that a fictional Bank like the Bank of Montréal has any authority over a human being? Obviously they don't unless you consent to do what you're told by them. The only people the Bank of Montréal can tell what to do are being paid by BMO! It is the human being that gets to dictate how he or she will communicate with the Bank, for example.

Legal Notice

Court order registered in the common law Superior Court of British Columbia
RES JUDICATA’
On Monday, March 14, 2016 an “exchange of consents” court order was registered in the Nanaimo County Courthouse regarding theBank of Montréal and the affiant. The court order was not rejected by the registrar and is therefore in good standing.
The court order was supported by an affidavit that was not rebutted in the time frame given.

The Bank of Montréal, redacted and redacted has 30 days from today Friday, March 18, 2016 to satisfy the court order requirements.
THIS COURT ORDERS that: redacted
Copyright 2015-2019 - all Human Rights Reserved
Blog
Site Map
Back to content