human rights and the juristic unit courts - canadian government conspiracies

Go to content

human rights and the juristic unit courts

Private Individual > Government
See the "Recent Activity" page for a complete list of changes

Remembering that if you don’t know what your rights are personally, the government has no reason to protect them and doesn’t!

human rights and the juristic unit courts  page added 2016-10-17 Last revised 2016-10-17

Notice of default regarding human rights and the juristic unit courts

1. As agreed, any restrictions found in any FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Act or any other title addressing the same civil law topic on restricting access to information would be a trespass on the rights of someone who is not enumerated as a class of subject under your authority:
a. the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
b. the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
c. To know, seek, obtain, receive and hold information about all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including having access to information as to how those rights and freedoms are given effect in domestic legislative, judicial or administrative systems, Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;

2. As agreed, the “request for information” requires information from the juristic units as to how our inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms are given effect in domestic legislative, judicial or administrative systems, received no response violating human rights:
a. Our public servant government cannot do anything without the consent of the individual. You have no authority to fraudulently assume and presume such consent is automatically yours because of your internal policies/statutes, rules and regulations that limits human rights, when nothing could be further from the truth!
b. Our public servant government cannot do anything without the consent of the individual. Your juristic units have no authority to sell inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms or justice to the people. Or to deny or delay inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms or justice to the individual!
c. Our public servant government cannot do anything without our consent and have no authority to violate the inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof without due process of law!
d. ‘Courts of record’ are common law courts and therefore courts of justice. Your juristic units has no authority to have administrative courts of record regulated under civil statutes and regulations using fraud and deception to deny human rights protection like it does!
e. Judges have no immunity in the four constitutional named courts of record.
f. Your juristic units have no authority to have your court services branch and your agents  including your judges prevent open access to courts that will protect human rights;
g. Your juristic units have no authority that allows any person working for your civil law juristic units to violate your primary duty and to trespass;
The affiant claimed no authority exists and fraud and rights violations were in play and the government and all government actors involved are accountable for damages already claimed or about to be claimed! This was not denied.

3. As agreed, the head of a public body was to respond within 30 days after receiving a request, but did not and that is another rights violation for the heads of the public body named above.

4. As agreed, Silence comprises agreement in commerce, equity, admiralty, Lex Mercatoria and public policy;


Notice of FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Request regarding human rights

Your juristic units have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

All people have the right to know, seek, obtain, receive and hold information about all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including having access to information as to how those rights and freedoms are given effect in domestic legislative, judicial or administrative systems.

Your juristic units are public servants instituted among individuals to serve those individuals and you derive your authority to govern those individuals from the consent of those individuals not the governed." Any authority our public servants have is by our consent, if our public servants act outside their authority the public servants both personally and professionally are subject to criminal charges and liable for damages under civil law and common law.

Common law is still law of the land. The Canadian Constitution must be construed to reference the common law. All civil law enactments that are not properly enacted, summary proceedings etc. are null & void to anyone who is not enumerated as a class of subject under any juristic units’ authority. No juristic unit shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of the private individuals of Canada nor shall any juristic unit deprive the inalienable human rights and fundamental freedoms of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof without due process of law. "Law of the land," "due course of law," and "due process of law" are synonymous.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether Federal or Provincial, though having the form and name of law in reality is no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the enactment which in the case of British Columbia would be 1996 for most unconstitutional enactments.

"Officers of the court have no immunity when violating Constitutional rights, from liability"
JUDICIAL IMMUNITY Judges are under the illusion that they have absolute immunity but all the cases that are cited making such a claim are without authority [people] and will fail in the federal and provincial courts in a court of record. Only the people are sovereign, all servants are under statutes and therefore liable
Copyright 2015-2019 - all Human Rights Reserved
Blog
Site Map
Back to content