Public Notice “ Inherent Jurisdiction” - canadian government conspiracies

Go to content

Public Notice “ Inherent Jurisdiction”

Home > Public Notices
Inherent Jurisdiction  Last revised 2016-11-03

jag.minister@gov.bc.ca; Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca; Jerymy.Brownridge@gov.bc.ca; ghinfo@gov.bc.ca; mcu@justice.gc.ca; stephen.wallace@gg.ca;

Thursday, November 3, 2016
 
7. “Public Notice “Inherent Jurisdiction”

Witnessed by God and the Dominion of Canada’s common law society’s Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould
 
  1. The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;

  2. Canadian Bill of Rights S.C. 1960, c. 44 Assented to 1960-08-10 - An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms [http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/page-1.html]

    Preamble
    Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;
    And being desirous of enshrining these principles and the human rights and fundamental freedoms derived from them, in a Bill of Rights which shall reflect the respect of Parliament for its constitutional authority and which shall ensure the protection of these human rights and fundamental freedoms in Canada:
    Therefore Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows…
    The right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by the administration of justice and the due process of rule of law; [PART I Bill of Rights 1 1.]

  3. CANADA (0000230098) and the PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (0000836136) or any of their actors, have a prime duty and responsibility to promote and protect all substantive human rights and fundamental freedoms in particular the right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law.

  4. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights [http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html]

    Preamble
    Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
    Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
    Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
    Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
    Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

    Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a common law society member or a civil law society member before the law.
    Article 7. All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination because of which society they choose to belong to, to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
    Article 8. Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals representing their chosen society for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

  5. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx]

    Preamble
    The States Parties to the present Covenant,
    Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
    Recognizing that these rights derive from the inherent dignity of the human person,
    Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free human beings enjoying freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his economic, social and cultural rights, as well as his civil and political rights,
    Considering the obligation of States under the Charter of the United Nations to promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and freedoms,
    Realizing that the individual, having duties to other individuals and to the community to which he belongs, is under a responsibility to strive for the promotion and observance of the rights recognized in the present Covenant,

  6. Declaration on the Right and Responsibility [http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightAndResponsibility.aspx]

    The General Assembly,
    Reaffirming the importance of the observance of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations for the promotion and protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all persons in all countries of the world,
    Reaffirming also the importance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenants on Human Rights as basic elements of international efforts to promote universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms and the importance of other human rights instruments adopted within the United Nations system, as well as those at the regional level,
    Stressing that all members of the international community shall fulfil, jointly and separately, their solemn obligation to promote and encourage respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction of any kind, including distinctions based on race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, and reaffirming the particular importance of achieving international cooperation to fulfil this obligation according to the Charter,
    Acknowledging the important role of international cooperation for, and the valuable work of individuals, groups and associations in contributing to, the effective elimination of all violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms of peoples and individuals, including in relation to mass, flagrant or systematic violations such as those resulting from apartheid, all forms of racial discrimination, colonialism, foreign domination or occupation, aggression or threats to national sovereignty, national unity or territorial integrity and from the refusal to recognize the right of peoples to self-determination and the right of every people to exercise full sovereignty over its wealth and natural resources,
    Recognizing the relationship between international peace and security and the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and mindful that the absence of international peace and security does not excuse non-compliance,
    Reiterating that all human rights and fundamental freedoms are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated and should be promoted and implemented in a fair and equitable manner, without prejudice to the implementation of each of those rights and freedoms,
    Stressing that the prime responsibility and duty to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms lie with the State,
    Recognizing the right and the responsibility of individuals, groups and associations to promote respect for and foster knowledge of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the national and international levels,

    Article 2
    1. Each State has a prime responsibility and duty to protect, promote and implement all human rights and fundamental freedoms, inter alia, by adopting such steps as may be necessary to create all conditions necessary in the social, economic, political and other fields, as well as the legal guarantees required to ensure that all persons under its jurisdiction, individually and in association with others, are able to enjoy all those rights and freedoms in practice.
    2. Each State shall adopt such legislative, administrative and other steps as may be necessary to ensure that the rights and freedoms referred to in the present Declaration are effectively guaranteed.
    Article 3
    Domestic law consistent with the Charter of the United Nations and other international obligations of the State in the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms is the juridical framework within which human rights and fundamental freedoms should be implemented and enjoyed and within which all activities referred to in the present Declaration for the promotion, protection and effective realization of those rights and freedoms should be conducted.
    Article 10
    No one shall participate, by act or by failure to act where required, in violating human rights and fundamental freedoms and no one shall be subjected to punishment or adverse action of any kind for refusing to do so.

  7. 26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada. [http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html#h-39]
    52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada.

  8. The claimant is not an enumerated fictional class of subject in section 91 or 92 of the British North America Act. [http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/constitution/lawreg-loireg/p1t13.html]. Therefore the claimant remains in the inherent jurisdiction.

  9. Duality of legal traditions and application of provincial law - 8.1 Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and recognized sources of the law of property as well as civil rights in Canada. [ http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/i-21/page-2.html#docCont]

  10. Magna Carta [http://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-english-translation]

    (38) In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.
    (39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the previous lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land. Fictions are not equal to real people!
    (40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.
    (45) We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or other officials, only men that know the law of the land and are minded to keep it well [administration of justice].

  11. The claimant a common law society member has no reason to hear or think about the Civil law Democratic Societies “Statutes Enactments Regulations”! All such interference by government agents trying to enforce such foreign de facto law that is not bijural or properly enacted is a trespass on human rights.

  12. The Charter like the B.N.A. Act only applies to governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations. Application of Charter Section 32 [http://canada.pch.gc.ca/eng/1468851006026] The same is true for all your statutes, enactments, regulations, etcetera which are nothing more than internal operating procedures that are not applicable as a controlling mechanism on the public. After all we are all equal!

  13. For any government created in section 91 or 92 of the B.N.A. Act [http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/constitution/lawreg-loireg/p1t11.html] to assume and presume authority over the people places the people into the class of subject known as slaves. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 4. [http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html]

  14. All actors have a prime responsibility and duty to protect, promote and implement all human rights and fundamental freedoms and those who choose not to, regardless of who they are will have trespassed on the claimant’s human rights and will be held accountable!
 
Notice on one is notice on the other!
 
Claimant, human being
2016-11-03
 
By Summary Judgement

  1. the need for effective administration of justice under the rule of law may appear obvious; yet the absence of an effective administration of common law justice continues to plague numerous individuals in what is constitutionally a bijural legal system in Canada;
  2. the right to an effective remedy when rights are violated is itself a right expressly guaranteed by most international human rights instruments. The international guarantee of a remedy implies that a state that has violated a human right has the primary duty to afford an effective remedy to the victim. International tribunals and supervisory bodies play a subsidiary role; they only come into play when the state fails to afford the required redress;
  3. The Province of British Columbia has the constitutional requirement to make available the courts for the BNA Acts’ attorney general to exercise the administration of justice and the rule of law for the common law people in;   
Our Inherent Jurisdiction Courts Last revised 2016 11 03

There are only two types of courts available in any jurisdiction in Canada!

Just like there are two types of citizens.

As Diefenbaker said “I am a Canadian, a free Canadian or I am free to take part in the democratic society!”

In Constitutional terms you are either enumerated as a class of subject prescribed with duties and rights under the civil government of that democratic society’s authority or you are not.

You are either a Canadian Citizen prescribed under civil government enactments and authority with rights or freedoms protected by the Charter, or you are a Canadian Citizen, a private individual who has inherent rights and fundamental freedoms protected by the constitution!

You are either a Canadian Citizen subject to civil government enactment created courts or you are not!

Court Type number one – A statute created court
If you are a private individual attending a statue created court, the court cannot hear you in that capacity! You have agreed by tacit agreement to their jurisdiction just by being there unless you have stated conditions under which you are appearing up front!

By that I mean any claim you make as a private individual is irrelevant in that court because you are enumerated as a class of subject under their jurisdiction or you have no business being there. Think of yourself as being in court in a foreign jurisdiction and it should become clearer – would and American judge in an America court hear any Canadian law argument?

Court Type number two – The constitutional courts
These courts are courts of inherent jurisdiction and were in place when the Dominion of Canada came into existence. Before any government existed.

These courts are not subject to prescribed statute law but statue law that violates the constitution are subject to the jurisdiction of these courts

-----
 
jag.minister@gov.bc.ca; Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca; Jerymy.Brownridge@gov.bc.ca; ghinfo@gov.bc.ca; sc.scheduling_na@courts.gov.bc.ca; Lynda.Cavanaugh@gov.bc.ca;
mcu@justice.gc.ca; stephen.wallace@gg.ca; Jerymy.Brownridge@gov.bc.ca; ghinfo@gov.bc.ca;

Thursday, November 3, 2016

Public Notice Regarding “Inherent Jurisdiction Courts”

Witnessed by God and the Dominion of Canada’s common law society’s Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould

1.  Documents must meet the standard "AS ANY REASONABLE PERSON WOULD UNDERSTAND" and that is all! A "REASONABLE PERSON" does not speak or understand legal jargon! The fraudulent use of the all caps name and the meaning behind it is not understood by ANY REASONABLE PERSON.

2.  All governments do have the prime duty and responsibility to protect our human rights not the so called rights they extend fraudulently to their fictional legal fictions/persons.

3.  See http://www.canadiangovernmentconspiracies.com/inherent-jurisdiction.html tab 1 above and include that with this

4.  State and government requirements towards “Inherent Jurisdiction Courts under the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility [http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightAndResponsibility.aspx]

Preamble – “Stressing that the prime responsibility and duty to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms lie with the State, [http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightAndResponsibility.aspx]
Article 2
1. Each State has a prime responsibility and duty to protect, promote and implement all human rights and fundamental freedoms, inter alia, by adopting such steps as may be necessary to create all conditions necessary in the social, economic, political and other fields, as well as the legal guarantees required to ensure that all persons under its jurisdiction, individually and in association with others, are able to enjoy all those rights and freedoms in practice.
2. Each State shall adopt such legislative, administrative and other steps as may be necessary to ensure that the rights and freedoms referred to in the present Declaration are effectively guaranteed.
Article 3
Domestic law consistent with the Charter of the United Nations and other international obligations of the State in the field of human rights and fundamental freedoms is the juridical framework within which human rights and fundamental freedoms should be implemented and enjoyed and within which all activities referred to in the present Declaration for the promotion, protection and effective realization of those rights and freedoms should be conducted.
Article 9
1. In the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the promotion and protection of human rights as referred to in the present Declaration, everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to benefit from an effective remedy and to be protected in the event of the violation of those rights.
2. To this end, everyone whose rights or freedoms are allegedly violated has the right, either in person or through legally authorized representation, to complain to and have that complaint promptly reviewed in a public hearing before an independent, impartial and competent judicial or other authority established by law and to obtain from such an authority a decision, in accordance with law, providing redress, including any compensation due, where there has been a violation of that person's rights or freedoms, as well as enforcement of the eventual decision and award, all without undue delay.
3. To the same end, everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, inter alia:
(a) To complain about the policies and actions of individual officials and governmental bodies with regard to violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, by petition or other appropriate means, to competent domestic judicial, administrative or legislative authorities or any other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, which should render their decision on the complaint without undue delay;
(b) To attend public hearings, proceedings and trials so as to form an opinion on their compliance with national law and applicable international obligations and commitments;
(c) To offer and provide professionally qualified legal assistance or other relevant advice and assistance in defending human rights and fundamental freedoms.
4. To the same end, and in accordance with applicable international instruments and procedures, everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to unhindered access to and communication with international bodies with general or special competence to receive and consider communications on matters of human rights and fundamental freedoms.
5. The State shall conduct a prompt and impartial investigation or ensure that an inquiry takes place whenever there is reasonable ground to believe that a violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms has occurred in any territory under its jurisdiction.
Article 10
No one shall participate, by act or by failure to act where required, in violating human rights and fundamental freedoms and no one shall be subjected to punishment or adverse action of any kind for refusing to do so.

5.  26. The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada. [http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/page-15.html#h-39]
    52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada.

7.  The right of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by the administration of justice and the due process of rule of law; PART I Bill of Rights 1 1. (a) [http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/page-1.html#h-1]

8.  The claimant is not an enumerated fictional class of subject in section 91 or 92 of the British North America Act. [http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/constitution/lawreg-loireg/p1t13.html].

9.  Duality of legal traditions and application of provincial law - 8.1 Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and recognized sources of the law of property as well as civil rights in Canada. [ http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/i-21/page-2.html#docCont]

10.   Universal Declaration of Human Rights [http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html]
  Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a common law society member or a civil law society member before the law.
Article 7. All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination as to which society they choose to belong to, to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8. Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals representing their chosen society for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

 (38) In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.
(39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the previous lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land. Fictions are not equal to real people!
(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.
(45) We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or other officials, only men that know the law of the land and are minded to keep it well [administration of justice].

12.   The claimant a common law society member has no reason to hear or think about the Civil law Democratic Societies “Statutes Enactments Regulations”! All such interference by government agents trying to enforce such foreign de facto law that is not bijural or properly enacted is a trespass on human rights.

13.   The Charter like the B.N.A. Act only applies to governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations. Application of Charter Section 32 [http://canada.pch.gc.ca/eng/1468851006026] The same is true for all your statutes, enactments, regulations, etcetera which are nothing more than internal operating procedures that are not applicable as a controlling mechanism on the public. After all we are all equal!

14.   For any government created in section 91 or 92 of the B.N.A. Act [http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/constitution/lawreg-loireg/p1t11.html] to assume and presume authority over the people places the people into the class of subject known as slaves. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 4. [http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html]

15.   All actors have a prime responsibility and duty to protect, promote and implement all human rights and fundamental freedoms and those who choose not to, regardless of who they are will have trespassed on the claimant’s human rights and will be held accountable!

Notice on one is notice on the other!
 
Bruce McDonald, human being
 2016-11-03
 
 
Going to Court Last revised – 2016 10 25

We have Given Names and Surnames only. In the civil law jurisdiction persons are addressed as Mr., Mrs., Miss, first name last name etc. which are all part of being enumerated as a “class of Subject” in and under their authority and this needs to be denied every time they address you as one of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province/Canada subjects. That is made to sound like the protector of the common law on purpose but it isn’t!

Four courts existed at the time the Dominion of Canada came into being that can enforce inalienable rights and fundamental freedoms and have Inherent Jurisdiction. They are named in s96 and s101 of the Constitution Act of Canada.

The Constitution Act is the highest man made law in Canada. The charter is part of the Constitution. Charter section 26 elevates human rights and freedoms to the constitutional level. This would include international treaties and British Law and the Canadian Bill of Rights.

The force of law within the geographical limits of British Columbia as they existed on November 19, 1858 prior to the formation of the Dominion of Canada was exclusively common law and inherent jurisdiction courts. Everyone was a private individual and still is if you so choose, but you have to claim that status in your paperwork before court.

Without that claim in place you have agreed to be the assigned fictional entity the second you appear in any government created statutory court under their rules. Plus you cannot be heard, only private individuals have a voice not fictions.

Any lawyer will find a reason for not placing that claim into the court file because they are members of the democratic society and operate strictly under statute law.

With that said the executive branch of government has done everything they can through their statues and regulations including us representing fiction who have no rights to prevent “private individuals” from appearing in a statutory court.

The democratic societies have not fulfilled any of their obligations to private individuals required by the constitution under international law. They have been caught limiting and abridging our rights and we individually have to call them on it.

The enactment itself may not violate rights directly but the prescribed rules, regulations or agents may be putting their own spin on the enactment to get the results they want. So it may not always be both!

If you are forced into a statutory court remember everything is contract law and it is not settled until 3 days later. Giving you plenty of time to remove any agreement tacit or otherwise made under duress and to apologize for trespassing into their jurisdiction but it was done out of private necessity because of the perceived threat!

Fraud upon the court Last revised – 2016 10 25

Fraud on the court occurs when the judicial machinery itself has been tainted, such as when an attorney, who is an officer of the court, is involved in the perpetration of a fraud or makes material misrepresentations to the court. Fraud upon the court makes void the orders and judgments of that court.

Canadian to Canadian!

How does a Canadian born and living lawfully within the territory of Canada, with the inalienable rights like everyone else, gain access to the courts being blocked by your civil corporate governments’ “fraud upon the courts”.

Ignorance of the law of the land by fictional government agents and representatives is not an excuse for breaking the law and is very unlikely. Your civil corporate Governments are still to recognize these requirements:
a) Appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know all the rules of law in the realm and mean to observe them well; Magna Carta
b) All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
c) Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
-----

Everyone under international law has the right, individually and in association with others to know, seek, obtain, receive and hold information about all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including having access to information as to how those rights and freedoms are given effect in domestic legislative, judicial or administrative systems;

Response received – silence!
----

Fraud upon the court notice

On 20160529 Fraud upon the court notice/affidavit involving those same questions was emailed to the appropriate people. Actors playing the parts in the executive branch at the Provincial and Federal Level.

Response None! The unrebutted affidavit became a Judgement in Commerce!
----

Opportunity to Cure

On 20160602 Fraud upon the court opportunity to cure/affidavit was emailed to the appropriate people.

Response None: The unrebutted affidavit became a Judgement in Commerce!
----

Fraud upon the court Default and Dishonour

20160609 Fraud upon the court Default and Dishonour, Affidavit was emailed to the appropriate people.

The unrebutted "court opportunity to cure/affidavit" became a Default and Dishonour Judgement in Commerce!
Our Human Rights

Remembering that if you don’t know what your human rights are personally, the government has no reason to protect them and doesn’t!

Even though....

The right to an effective remedy when human rights are violated is itself a right expressly guaranteed by most international human rights instruments. The international guarantee of a remedy implies that a state that has violated a human right has the primary duty to afford an effective remedy to the victim. International tribunals and supervisory bodies play a subsidiary role; they only come into play when the state fails to afford the required redress;

Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightAndResponsibility.aspx
all human rights and fundamental freedoms are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated and should be promoted and implemented in a fair and equitable manner, without prejudice to the implementation of each of those rights and freedoms. [preamble]

Article 2
1. Each State has a prime responsibility and duty to protect, promote and implement all human rights and fundamental freedoms, inter alia, by adopting such steps as may be necessary to create all conditions necessary in the social, economic, political and other fields, as well as the legal guarantees required to ensure that all persons under its jurisdiction, individually and in association with others, are able to enjoy all those rights and freedoms in practice.
2. Each State shall adopt such legislative, administrative and other steps as may be necessary to ensure that the rights and freedoms referred to in the present Declaration are effectively guaranteed.

Article 9
1. In the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the promotion and protection of human rights as referred to in the present Declaration, everyone has the right, individually and in association with others, to benefit from an effective remedy and to be protected in the event of the violation of those rights.
2. To this end, everyone whose rights or freedoms are allegedly violated has the right, either in person or through legally authorized representation, to complain to and have that complaint promptly reviewed in a public hearing before an independent, impartial and competent judicial or other authority established by law and to obtain from such an authority a decision, in accordance with law, providing redress, including any compensation due, where there has been a violation of that person's rights or freedoms, as well as enforcement of the eventual decision and award, all without undue delay. [The onus here is that the actual protect of human right is the duty and responsibly of government not a woman or man!]

John Diefenbaker was the 13th Prime Minister of Canada, serving from June 21, 1957 to April 22, 1963. - "I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind."
- July 1, 1960. From the Canadian Bill of Rights. John Diefenbaker Quotes - http://www.azquotes.com/author/21356-John_Diefenbaker

Copyright 2015-2019 - all Human Rights Reserved
Blog
Site Map
Back to content